Talk:White witch

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Occupations (inactive)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page:
• White magic
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:White magic
Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions.

"Normal" witches?

I disagree with the fact the artical states distinguish those helpful witches who do not use magic to harm others from normal witches.

White may be used to state that a witch is not black but that does not mean normal withces harm people as a matter of fact. well some witches may not mean to harmt he people that they did it could have very well been a spell mess up.

As the article explains, when the term arose, all "normal" witches were assumed to be evil, almost without exception. This is not true now, but it was then.--Cúchullain ^t/c 23:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unaware of any evidence that magic or "fairy familars" actually exist. Why does this article imply that they do?Web wonder (talk) 03:32, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Fairy familiars (biology)? Currently, the article doesn't imply the existence of evidence (scientific or anecdotal). It uses terms like "see themselves as", "convicted of", "considered themselves", "described their contacts with fairies", "beliefs" and "themes". I've removed the word "actual" from the end of the first sentence "practitioners of actual malevolent witchcraft." Possibly the word "fairy" could be removed from "whose fairy familiars had been demonised" but the acceptability of the term "familiar" would seem to depend on one's interpretation. Also, "fairy familiars," might be the term used in the cited works. — Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 17:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cunning-folk didn't have familiars and they didn't fit the definition of witches and didn't consider themselves witches. This article is the usual wikipedia neo-pagan and Wiccan pseudo-scientific nonsense! 86.184.217.7 (talk) 13:33, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Someone has taken the opportunity to fill this article with very dubious claims. It either needs to be entirely re-written or just deleted. Wight1984 (talk) 14:08, 25 February 2015 (GMT)

If a white witch is a good witch why was the villain of the Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe was called the White Witch.

Because the term is usually used by neo-pagan, pseudo-scientific fools who think they are witches and Lewis was probably unaware of this meaning when he created that character; she is white due to the snow. 86.184.217.7 (talk) 13:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Merged to Folk healer per tag since March 2013. Mannanan51 (talk) 05:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]